

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
167.8
123.4
-26%
121.7
-27%
141.1
-16%
123.4
-26%
117.5
-30%
149 (92.5 – 208, n=9)
-11%
117 (67.3 – 246, n=302)
-30%
53.48
45.59
-15%
43.81
-18%
45.02
-16%
46.47
-13%
48.9 (40.5 – 54.3, n=9)
-9%
43.6 (27.6 – 148, n=302)
-18%
3073
2372 (1197 – 3241, n=9)
-23%
1401 (486 – 4081, n=297)
-54%
2488
2057 (1018 – 3037, n=9)
-17%
1546 (539 – 5378, n=297)
-38%
523.6
406.6
-22%
368.2
-30%
423 (289 – 540, n=9)
-19%
365 (278 – 706, n=302)
-30%
594.8
470.2
-21%
412.9
-31%
491 (332 – 620, n=9)
-17%
429 (298 – 898, n=302)
-28%
3324
3310 (3284 – 3332, n=9)
0%
1660 (529 – 4413, n=302)
-50%
3564
3542 (3477 – 3567, n=9)
-1%
2512 (561 – 9006, n=302)
-30%
872.5
1368.42
57%
697.29
-20%
1806 (802 – 5984, n=6)
107%
744 (23 – 5984, n=331)
-15%
602.86
538.56
-11%
446.02
-26%
868 (390 – 2694, n=6)
44%
376 (8 – 2694, n=331)
-38%
2383.4
1876.88
-21%
1494.8
-37%
2102 (1710 – 2383, n=6)
-12%
1141 (12 – 3474, n=331)
-52%
5760
5615 (4450 – 6152, n=9)
-3%
2262 (30 – 6232, n=580)
-61%
2719
2534 (1560 – 2892, n=9)
-7%
887 (11 – 3011, n=581)
-67%
2012
2041 (1846 – 2291, n=9)
1%
917 (10 – 2304, n=581)
-54%
0.027
0.032
-19%
0.106
-293%
0.041
-52%
0.032
-19%
0.031 (0.02 – 0.054, n=9)
-15%
0.3165 (0.0163 – 26.9, n=612)
-1072%
0.034
0.076
-124%
0.049
-44%
0.082
-141%
0.07
-106%
0.051
-50%
0.0441 (0.031 – 0.062, n=9)
-30%
0.3772 (0.03 – 18.6, n=603)
-1009%
2292.59
1985.92
-13%
1774.98
-23%
874.53
-62%
1957.87
-15%
2444.35
7%
2136 (1189 – 2440, n=9)
-7%
652 (0.43 – 2797, n=614)
-72%
1671.97
1237.48
-26%
1805.45
8%
590.67
-65%
1525.36
-9%
1222.33
-27%
1718 (1579 – 1938, n=9)
3%
702 (0.44 – 1954, n=614)
-58%
142.48
117.07
-18%
104.12
-27%
117.94
-17%
116.76
-18%
134 (100 – 188, n=9)
-6%
111 (0.53 – 11894, n=614)
-22%
51.64
43.42
-16%
48.6 (27.9 – 58.3, n=9)
-6%
35.7 (0.35 – 105, n=614)
-31%
2841.56
2309.49
-19%
2354.22
-17%
1477.88
-48%
2192.74
-23%
2627.22
-8%
2645 (2469 – 2842, n=9)
-7%
1024 (43.6 – 4146, n=614)
-64%
2879.15
1761.83
-39%
1880.65
-35%
1777.82
-38%
1790.65
-38%
2946.35
2%
2741 (2173 – 3002, n=9)
-5%
1399 (55.7 – 4886, n=614)
-51%
The post Schenker Compact 17 (Clevo PB71DF2-G) in review: A lot of performance with little heat development appeared first on abangtech.
source https://abangtech.com/schenker-compact-17-clevo-pb71df2-g-in-review-a-lot-of-performance-with-little-heat-development/
No comments:
Post a Comment