Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Smartphone Review: After Community feedback, the best Galaxy S20

Source

The post Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Smartphone Review: After Community feedback, the best Galaxy S20 appeared first on abangtech.

source https://abangtech.com/samsung-galaxy-s20-fe-5g-smartphone-review-after-community-feedback-the-best-galaxy-s20/

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	3712 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3112 Points ∼77% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3230 Points ∼80% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	3830 Points ∼94% +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	3888 Points ∼96% +5%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4057 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (1788 – 4061, n=16)	3552 Points ∼88% -4%
Average of class Smartphone   (1740 – 4061, n=193)	2662 Points ∼66% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	7618 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6315 Points ∼72% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8783 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8173 Points ∼93% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8279 Points ∼94% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6360 Points ∼72% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (7618 – 9104, n=16)	8239 Points ∼94% +8%
Average of class Smartphone   (203 – 11259, n=193)	3069 Points ∼35% -60%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	6174 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5139 Points ∼78% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6355 Points ∼96% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6578 Points ∼99% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	6618 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5648 Points ∼85% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (4604 – 6961, n=17)	6323 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone   (253 – 6977, n=193)	2721 Points ∼41% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	5176 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4063 Points ∼71% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4495 Points ∼78% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	5277 Points ∼92% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5506 Points ∼96% +6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5728 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (5170 – 5780, n=17)	5405 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Smartphone   (573 – 5780, n=547)	2256 Points ∼39% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8633 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8106 Points ∼86% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9190 Points ∼98% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9356 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9379 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6771 Points ∼72% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (8633 – 9567, n=17)	9376 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone   (75 – 12146, n=547)	2234 Points ∼24% -74%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	7517 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6638 Points ∼82% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7459 Points ∼92% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7986 Points ∼98% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8111 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6508 Points ∼80% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (7517 – 8269, n=18)	8059 Points ∼99% +7%
Average of class Smartphone   (93 – 9643, n=548)	2070 Points ∼26% -72%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	5110 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3935 Points ∼69% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4455 Points ∼78% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4283 Points ∼75% -16%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5480 Points ∼96% +7%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5718 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (3956 – 5765, n=17)	5152 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone   (375 – 5765, n=579)	2173 Points ∼38% -57%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	11956 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	11301 Points ∼89% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9471 Points ∼75% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12694 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	12665 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7905 Points ∼62% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (11956 – 13023, n=17)	12699 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone   (70 – 21465, n=579)	3035 Points ∼24% -75%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	9213 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7981 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	7576 Points ∼77% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8823 Points ∼90% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	9807 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7286 Points ∼74% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (8499 – 10090, n=17)	9567 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone   (88 – 11895, n=579)	2515 Points ∼26% -73%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	5144 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3963 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4180 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4895 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4987 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4971 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (4582 – 5209, n=17)	4966 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone   (435 – 5262, n=628)	2133 Points ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8629 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8411 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8469 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	8299 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8106 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6465 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (7854 – 9167, n=17)	8312 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone   (53 – 11573, n=628)	1878 Points ∼22% -78%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	7500 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6732 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6896 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7157 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7117 Points ∼95% -5%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6060 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (6943 – 7653, n=18)	7221 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone   (68 – 9138, n=629)	1779 Points ∼24% -76%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	4841 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4015 Points ∼81% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4124 Points ∼83% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	4729 Points ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	4928 Points ∼99% +2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4975 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (3965 – 5274, n=17)	4855 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone   (293 – 5274, n=670)	2004 Points ∼40% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	11632 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6388 Points ∼52% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	6392 Points ∼52% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	12394 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11371 Points ∼92% -2%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7499 Points ∼61% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (11117 – 13305, n=17)	11839 Points ∼96% +2%
Average of class Smartphone   (43 – 16670, n=669)	2485 Points ∼20% -79%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	8868 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5646 Points ∼62% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	5696 Points ∼62% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	9123 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	8811 Points ∼97% -1%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6739 Points ∼74% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (8215 – 9611, n=17)	8962 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone   (55 – 11256, n=672)	2123 Points ∼23% -76%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	46963 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	27431 Points ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	32384 Points ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	32240 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	46731 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (17817 – 58293, n=16)	34032 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Smartphone   (735 – 59268, n=814)	15761 Points ∼34% -66%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	110875 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	48476 Points ∼32% -56%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	150281 Points ∼100% +36%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	149017 Points ∼99% +34%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	82652 Points ∼55% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (110875 – 154375, n=16)	145351 Points ∼97% +31%
Average of class Smartphone   (536 – 221179, n=812)	28064 Points ∼19% -75%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	85130 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	41415 Points ∼49% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	82937 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	82562 Points ∼97% -3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	70593 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (56045 – 112989, n=16)	81987 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone   (662 – 117606, n=812)	21675 Points ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	32 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps ∼67% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	33 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	30 fps ∼91% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	31 fps ∼94% -3%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	23 fps ∼70% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (18 – 32, n=20)	27.5 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Smartphone   (0.61 – 60, n=339)	11.6 fps ∼35% -64%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	20 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	20 fps ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	22 fps ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	20 fps ∼91% 0%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	20 fps ∼91% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps ∼86% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (20 – 21, n=20)	20.2 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone   (0.21 – 101, n=337)	8.2 fps ∼37% -59%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	48 fps ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	52 fps ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	47 fps ∼90% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	48 fps ∼92% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	36 fps ∼69% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (28 – 53, n=20)	42.7 fps ∼82% -11%
Average of class Smartphone   (1.4 – 60, n=343)	17.3 fps ∼33% -64%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	47 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	54 fps ∼93% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	58 fps ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	54 (20min) fps ∼93% +15%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	54 fps ∼93% +15%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	50 fps ∼86% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (27 – 56, n=20)	51.8 fps ∼89% +10%
Average of class Smartphone   (0.6 – 257, n=342)	19.9 fps ∼34% -58%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	51 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	50 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	51 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	50 fps ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	51 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	44 fps ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (39 – 54, n=19)	50.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone   (0.6 – 75, n=505)	15 fps ∼29% -71%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	48 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	43 fps ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	45 fps ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	45 fps ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	45 fps ∼94% -6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	31 fps ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (25 – 48, n=19)	39.8 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone   (1.1 – 60, n=509)	13.3 fps ∼28% -72%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	1604 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1274 Points ∼78% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	1378 Points ∼85% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	1514 Points ∼93% -6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	1496 Points ∼92% -7%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1629 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (1276 – 1650, n=18)	1470 Points ∼90% -8%
Average of class Smartphone   (7 – 1745, n=749)	833 Points ∼51% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	11833 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10703 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	10803 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	11567 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	11842 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10138 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (11399 – 12073, n=18)	11688 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone   (18 – 16996, n=749)	2580 Points ∼22% -78%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	5304 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4271 Points ∼54% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	3775 Points ∼48% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	7945 Points ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	7240 Points ∼91% +37%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6038 Points ∼76% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (5304 – 8874, n=18)	7122 Points ∼90% +34%
Average of class Smartphone   (21 – 8874, n=749)	1932 Points ∼24% -64%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	9458 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	8843 Points ∼88% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	9281 Points ∼92% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	10002 Points ∼99% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	10058 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9782 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (8421 – 10147, n=18)	9752 Points ∼97% +3%
Average of class Smartphone   (369 – 14189, n=749)	3535 Points ∼35% -63%
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144	5555 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S20 Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4764 Points ∼78% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192	4779 Points ∼79% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192	6072 Points ∼100% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288	5993 Points ∼99% +8%
Huawei P40 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5589 Points ∼92% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865   (5264 – 6273, n=18)	5861 Points ∼97% +6%
Average of class Smartphone   (1 – 6273, n=749)	1813 Points ∼30% -67%